World of Warplanes

轉載自http://xvm.garphy.com/?p=13280的翻譯並轉繁中+修辭

There was apparently a long discussion about why World of Warplanes failed (yes, it is considered a failure). The points that were mentioned and on which the developers generally agreed:
他們對於為什麼戰機世界會失敗這一點討論了很長時間（沒錯，他們認為WoWP失敗了）。以下是開發團隊一致認同的部分：

- Bigworld engine physics are correct for the game – however, the execution of the project was bad, very bad, because “it's not as appealing or fun”
Bigworld的引擎的物理系統來說對這個遊戲是沒問題的，然而這個專案的執行不好，或者說很差，因為“它既不吸引人，也不是很有趣”。

- lack of proper tech trees, planes varieties, problems with joystick support, driving planes on keyboard isn't that great, and sluggish battle mechanics are considered the culprit of WoWp's failure against Warthunder dynamic gameplay, but that's ONLY concerning aerial warfare
沒有適當的科技樹，飛機的多樣性也不夠，搖桿支援也有問題，用鍵盤開飛機其實並不是很好。只包含空戰的部分來討論，用過於遲鈍的戰鬥機制來對抗WT那種動態遊戲模式是最大的敗筆。

- the main problem they mentioned was: “In WoT gameplay, you can pretty much go and at least deal some damage, make yourself be known, fight and earn your kills and skills. In WoWp, its all RNG, your ping dictates if a shower of bullets hits or not. Your plane, you aren't really feeling the controls. One feature we wanted was a complete cockpit view, never happened properly, you can spend dozens of battles without scoring a single kill despite actually doing your best to try, the sense of individuality is lost and the name just becomes “one more” of the crowd”
他們提到的主要問題是這樣的：“在WOT的遊戲性中呢，你最起碼可以出去打點傷害，讓群眾注意到你的存在，然後繼續戰鬥，殺人，磨練自己的技術。但是在戰機世界中這些都變成了RNG，你的PING決定了你這一串彈幕出去到底是打得中還是打不中。飛機也是感覺不到什麼操控性能。我們當初想要一個完整的駕駛員的座艙視野，也從來沒弄出來過，經常還有你已經很努力了，但是連續好多場都打不下一架飛機的情況。

- the companion AI autoaim is a mess, 80% of the time you are on a bomber, you'll miss the target
AI的自動瞄準也是一團亂，在玩轟炸機的時候，80%都打不到目標

- objectives were not proper or clear enough, with so much data filling the minimap, some players found themselves alienated and only spent time hitting boats or bases and not doing aerial combat
任務目標也是不夠精確，小地圖上有過多的資訊，部分玩家發現他們自己被孤立了，只能打小船和基地之類的且不參加空戰。

- graphical problems and pixelated areas despite good graphic cards didn't help either
就算顯卡很好，畫面問題還有馬賽克區域還是會存在

- “The fact that WT uses the client to perform some of the calculations while WOWp is all server based is a bit influential as well, however – it's impossible for WoWp to ever use that system, as it's quite easy to make cheats for it”
“WT使用了客戶端來處理部分資料，而戰機世界是全部都在伺服器端進行運算的這一點其實也有影響，然而戰機世界永遠不會使用像WT的方式，因為這會導致製作外掛變得很簡單”

- increasing the amount of data transferred would only clog servers and cause lag, disappearing planes are not fun
增加資料傳輸只會增加伺服器負擔以及導致lag，飛機突然在眼前消失並不有趣。

- consumables are considered okay, P2W factor was not of concern and it's considered balanced
他們覺得消耗品這點沒問題，P2W因素不成問題，而且他們認為消耗品很平衡